History of Hunger Strike

Andhra Pradesh a state formed with government agreeing to demands of separate state after Potti Sriramulu died fasting for the cause of a separate state for Telugu- Speaking people have a lot to share about Hunger Strikes. Its known news how KCR's fast on to death to achieve Telangana created furor in Andhra Pradesh. Now, R.Krishnayya's fast and fight to provide justice to the B.C students is creating ripples in our state. R.Krishnayya getting the support from all opposition parties and students, the government has come down and made it clear that it would take care of the student’s fees. So what is the origin of hunger strike? Let's go back to our history and check out the origin of Hunger Strike.
A hunger strike is a method of non-violent resistance or pressure in which participants fast as an act of political protest, or to provoke feelings of guilt in others, usually with the objective to achieve a specific goal, such as a policy change.
In India, the practice of a hunger protest, where the protestor fasts at the door of an offending party (typically a debtor) in a public call for justice, was abolished by the government in 1861; this indicates the prevalence of the practice prior to that date, or at least a public awareness of it. This Indian practice is ancient, going back to around 400 to 750 BC. This can be known since it appears in the Valmiki Ramayana, which was composed around that time. The actual mention appears in the Ayodhya Kanda, (the second book of the Ramayana), in Sarga (section) 103. Bharata has gone to ask the exiled Rama to come back and rule the kingdom. Bharata tries many arguments, none of which work, at which point he decides to do a hunger strike. He announces his intention to fast, calls for his charioteer Sumantra to bring him some sacred Kusha grass, (but Sumantra won't do it since he's too busy looking at Rama's face, so Bharata has to get the grass himself), lies down upon it in front of Rama. Rama, however, is quickly able to persuade him to abandon the attempt. Rama mentions it as a practice of the brahmanas.
Mahatma Gandhi was imprisoned in 1922, 1930, 1933 and 1942. Because of Gandhi's notoriety around the world, it is widely viewed that British authorities did not wish to allow him die in custody. It is likely Britain's reputation would have suffered as a result of such an event. However, many also claim that Gandhi would not martyr himself without good reason. Gandhi engaged in two famous hunger strikes. The first protested British rule of India, and the second protested autocratic rule in the newly independent India.
However strong the impact of a hunger strike is it is advisable if our leaders take it as the last step towards their struggle for people than as a first step. If we can achieve justice to people by democratic means let’s do that first and take to Hunger strike as the last step. Who wants to loose our leaders when we can have them with us and achieve growth.
Sharma S
The views expressed above are that of Author and not that of tv5news.in
To Submit your opinions on any topic please mail us at contact@tv5news.in with blogs:tilte as subject
A hunger strike is a method of non-violent resistance or pressure in which participants fast as an act of political protest, or to provoke feelings of guilt in others, usually with the objective to achieve a specific goal, such as a policy change.
In India, the practice of a hunger protest, where the protestor fasts at the door of an offending party (typically a debtor) in a public call for justice, was abolished by the government in 1861; this indicates the prevalence of the practice prior to that date, or at least a public awareness of it. This Indian practice is ancient, going back to around 400 to 750 BC. This can be known since it appears in the Valmiki Ramayana, which was composed around that time. The actual mention appears in the Ayodhya Kanda, (the second book of the Ramayana), in Sarga (section) 103. Bharata has gone to ask the exiled Rama to come back and rule the kingdom. Bharata tries many arguments, none of which work, at which point he decides to do a hunger strike. He announces his intention to fast, calls for his charioteer Sumantra to bring him some sacred Kusha grass, (but Sumantra won't do it since he's too busy looking at Rama's face, so Bharata has to get the grass himself), lies down upon it in front of Rama. Rama, however, is quickly able to persuade him to abandon the attempt. Rama mentions it as a practice of the brahmanas.
Mahatma Gandhi was imprisoned in 1922, 1930, 1933 and 1942. Because of Gandhi's notoriety around the world, it is widely viewed that British authorities did not wish to allow him die in custody. It is likely Britain's reputation would have suffered as a result of such an event. However, many also claim that Gandhi would not martyr himself without good reason. Gandhi engaged in two famous hunger strikes. The first protested British rule of India, and the second protested autocratic rule in the newly independent India.
However strong the impact of a hunger strike is it is advisable if our leaders take it as the last step towards their struggle for people than as a first step. If we can achieve justice to people by democratic means let’s do that first and take to Hunger strike as the last step. Who wants to loose our leaders when we can have them with us and achieve growth.
Sharma S
The views expressed above are that of Author and not that of tv5news.in
To Submit your opinions on any topic please mail us at contact@tv5news.in with blogs:tilte as subject
Click Here to View/Post Comments (10)
| sri :
sriramulu died for Andhra state with madras as capital city and not for AP state.
G R Jagannadh :
When faced with the absence of any credible subject to agitate on to make their presence felt Politicians seem to hit upon the idea of bifurcating the State in which they live; a particularly people divisive act. It is surprising on how it becomes so easy for these politicians to attract a set of people into such divisive actions. People just seem to love the idea of a separate name tag and do not seem to invest time to think about : what after? The leaders at the helm have to show some backbone to thwart such blackmailing actions and stop from dividing the States unnecessarily. Development is possible if some of the politicians concentrate on the development plans of areas and work mobilise funds as seed capital to initiate the project in someway to attract the Government and philanthropists to supply the funds for the project.
bhaskar :
He is a great soul ,just like mahathma.well satyagrha has gone in to wroung people like kcr etc
god save india
Jagannadh :
people should not be fooled by rhetoric{complex or elaborate language that only succeeds in sounding pretentious} and emotional blackmail to achieve Political ends.
Let us not forget that Representatives anywhere in the world would put their self Interests and best interests of their party first and only the common people later.
One should read Paul Krugman's Articles in the Hindu to know how true this is.
Jagannadh :
People cannot try to divide the people further
It is ridiculous to say that Forming the State of Andhra is the same as wanting to divide the State of AP Now.
Every time leaders from the Telangana regions are claiming that leaders from the Andhra Regions have robbed the riches of the Telangana regions through bringing capital.
Is bringing capital to a place a crime?
Can the Government only bring sufficient funds for Development to any region?
Capital from other regions is different from capital from Industrialists from non-Telangana regions of AP?
Is State a Property for whoever wants to separate to divide ?
What is this talk of saying "let us part as friends"? It is not anybody's property to say to divide the State as I want to separate!
What are the credentials of the people to say that I want to have the Sate divided?
Can anyone of them confirm that all the Districts, if Telangana is formed can be developed equally, at the same time? IT is just not possible.
If tomorrow some other leader goes on a fast on to death strike in a Hospital , they will again divide Telangana?
Is it a crime to want to live and settle in the State Capital?
Is it a crime to invest in the Sate Capital?
Who could imagine that investing in the State Capital from some 50-60 Years back would turn out to be the biggest blunder of their life?
Can people reverse the last 50-60 years ? can people get compensated enough ?
If Development is the issue, and Telangana has to be formed, than all the Backward Districts for the hole of AP should be clubbed together and the new State formed and not the Geographical picture that the leaders of the Telangana are projecting.
People who have got elected from the Sate of AP should first resign and than only talk of dividing the Sate. They got elected because of the unity of the Sate and had they talked of wanting to divide the State they might never have got elected.
Who can think of all the water sharing disputes these same leaders will rise.
The life will be made worse for everyone with the water sharing disputes.
kalvakota rammohanrao :
we respereally martierct sri potti sriramulu is real martyr,but his fast is not for unity of india. india was devided by his fast and he created chose in the country. sardar patel has united india,sri pottinsri ramulu and sri late Nehru has devided India ,andhras will be responsible,for linguistic fight ,which is already engulfing India . Maharashtra ,says it only allow north Indian in Mombay.the same way Tamils and Malyalees,Kandigas and Tmilians,Andhra v/s Karanataka,Maharashtra,Behar ,up,west bengal,Goorkhas.Assam, Bodo land,up wants devided in many small states,like Uttaranchal,Bundel khand etc.when historians write history it will blame only Andhras for dis integration of INdIA SRC should have recommended on the administrative and economic viability,not on the language basis.even now i think we must stop fight among the people.then all the languages can be developed.
not only that the expenditure, could have been reduced.for example if we have few states then the governors will be reduced .this is very unnecessary expenditure,for instance if we have states like north,south ,east west,central,southeast like we could have less states.no doubt we can not reduce assemblies and ministers but less cm';s.
it is high time to get the unity India the politicians must think and take corrective steps to unite
Sri KRishna cometee, is so appointed to bifurcate Andhra telengana.what isuggest that thestate of the then hyderabad state was real roll model as it was having unity amng four languages telugu,maratti,kannada,urdu,and many other languages ofIndia nad abroad werespoken aand all are united.it was mini India.
if we can reverse it will be roll model for india and otherstates.
naveen :
Potti sreeramul started/did Hunger Strike for separate Andhra state capital as Madras not at all related to Andhra pradesh, do not confuse fool people by making such false comments
TeluguDB :
Yeh! He is real hero of our Andhra Pradesh.
Anil :
My only question to people supporting samykyaandhra is why did they fight and got seperated from Madras teritory and if they have right for seperate state even telangan people have the same right
Girish :
A Very informative one.
|
|||
|
Don't post rude or nasty comments. Ethnic slurs, personal insults and abuses are rather uncool. Criticise, but know where to draw the line. No point putting in personal details or links, we won't publish them. |


